The date was March 14th. 3.14. So if you run them all together - leaving off the year, of course; I know, it's an inexact science! - then you would have 3.14 1:59. Which is as far out as I know the digits anyway, so no need to get fancy with the seconds on a digital watch.
4 comments:
Um, why 1:59? I thought you'd aim for 3:14 instead.
-- SJ
Ha ha! I know, I know! Because it *was* 3.14 already!
I should have made a pie. Maybe next year.
I still don't get it.
-- SJ
The date was March 14th. 3.14. So if you run them all together - leaving off the year, of course; I know, it's an inexact science! - then you would have 3.14 1:59. Which is as far out as I know the digits anyway, so no need to get fancy with the seconds on a digital watch.
Post a Comment